
Barely two days have gone by since Argentina lost the Davis Cup final. But some of the changes a defeat as momentous as this is always likely to cause have already taken place. Alberto Mancini has resigned from the office of team captain. His successor might be Martin Jaite, who has by now confirmed that he's no longer David's coach. Most importantly, however, a scapegoat has been found, the one person whose fault, and whose alone, all of this has been - David.
At least, that's the conclusion several international commentators arrive at (e.g. Peter Bodo for espn.com; Chris Bowers for tennisreporters.net). Their numerous accusations range from selfishly campaigning for Cordoba to having too much of a say regarding the court surface at Mar del Plata, painting the picture of an Argentine team that has all of its decisions made by David, whether concerning the venue, or even the choice of players getting nominated.
It's true that David did want the final to be held at Cordoba. After the semifinal, when the venue nomination had to be made and it still looked like Rafael Nadal would be leading the Spanish team, to play the final on a fast indoors court was a decision quickly reached (and defended against the AAT, who still wanted it held at the Parque Roca) by the entire Argentine team and Alberto Mancini. The only available indoor venue at Buenos Aires was soon ruled out, due to its size and major traffic problems holding the final there would've caused. Bearing in mind that there's only a very limited number of large indoor venues in Argentina, and one of them happens to be at Cordoba, I fail to see what was so wrong about David suggesting the Orfeo Superdomo and then campaigning for it. He also argued that Cordoba's altitude (comparable to Madrid), making the balls travel through the air a bit faster, would be advantageous for his and for Delpo's play.
As for David's influence on determining the court surface and its speed, during the three days the whole team spent getting it right, it became clear that David wanted it to be faster than the other players. A point had already been reached where he was perfectly happy with the speed. And yet, the surface was changed again afterwards, because of what the other players wanted. As Alberto Mancini said time and time again during those days, "we're getting to the point where all the guys agree".
David has also been held responsible for keeping Guillermo "Willy" Canas from making the team. How come then that Lucas Arnold Ker didn't get nominated although he would've been David's preferred choice as a doubles partner? Because it was Alberto Mancini who made that decision, and not David. Though I understand why Mancini didn't pick Ker. That would've meant relying 100% on David playing doubles, as Ker has no experience playing with Calleri or Acasuso. Mancini couldn't possibly foresee that David would have such an easy match against Ferrer. Therefore, he went for the safer option. And as for Canas, he's completely out of form at the moment, having just crashed out in the first round at two Challenger events in a row. How he could've helped the team in his current state, I really don't know.
Probably the worst allegation, however, and the one it all boils down to in the end is that David was the one who poisoned the atmosphere within the team, because of how "obsessed" he was with winning the Davis Cup for himself and his glory alone. In short, those who usually call him "disinterested" and "unmotivated" now accuse him of taking the Davis Cup way too seriously.
I'm not sure if those who wrote these articles have any idea of the situation the whole team found itself in, playing this final. Representing a proud sports nation that won its last big sports title back in 1986 (World Cup). For three days, tennis was as important as, if not more so than football. Winning the Davis Cup was a matter of national importance and pride, the expectations gigantic, the pressure for the team insane. In a situation like this, nobody can be expected to guard their emotions (and togues) at all times. After Delpo lost to Lopez, David reportedly snapped at him that this happened because he played Shanghai. Of course, that's not a nice or helpful thing to say. Other reports claim that on Saturday, either David and Delpo, or alternatively David and Calleri almost got into a fight after the doubles match. These reports have been denied by those involved and also by Alberto Mancini. It's impossible to know what really went on behind the scenes. All I can say is that I noticed how after the first day, David and Delpo stayed away from each other, apparently on non-speaking terms. Which could mean that there really was some sort of argument. It seems that David did make mistakes during this weekend, that he said things he shouldn't have said. But to blame him for single-handedly ruining the atmosphere is surely going way too far.
As mentioned in an article I translated for this blog, since first making the Davis Cup team in 2002, David has played 16 of the last 19 ties Argentina competed in until this final. To accuse him now of being a glory hunter, only after winning the title to achieve a maximum of fame in Argentina is simply laughable. Unlike other top players who only grace their Davis Cup teams with their presence if it fits in with their other plans, or if it's to keep their team in the World Group, David only once asked to be excused from playing (first round 2007, after losing the final 2006). Apart from that, only an injury can stop him from playing Davis Cup. Because it's an honour and not a duty to him. When he's talking about "defending the colours" he really means it. This kind of patriotism, this desire to play for the glory not of himself but of Argentina is something these commentators obviously don't understand (just as they're obviously unaware of the fame and reputation he already enjoys in his home country).
The English-speaking press have a long history of potraying David as someone who has no sense of humour, is invariably monosyllabic and generally bad-tempered. A judgement that's clearly, as well as exclusively based on his press conferences. And yet, I am at a loss to understand where all this hatred for David suddenly comes from.
After all the chaos during the weekend and not talking to the press after the doubles, David held a press conference at Mar del Plata yesterday (where the photo above was taken). Here are some quotes:
"We never had any problems in the dressing room. I did not like it, neither did the team, nor anybody else what was said about that. I'm very hurt by the defeat as a player and as a fan. Because of the passion with which I live Davis Cup, it hurts a lot. It's a shame that these things get distorted. I've been friends with Agustin for a long time. We have trained together, playing doubles on the Tour. I came from the match, did the doping test, and went to the hotel, because I felt bad, I was distressed. To arrive at the hotel, turn on the TV and hear that the Argentine team is fighting is a shame and it puts the players in a bad light."
"I am a tennis player, very passionate for my flag. And Agustin and I did have some heated exchanges on Saturday because we lost. You have to understand the pain it means losing a point so important in a Davis Cup final. That came with a lot of anguish and with a lot of pressure. I hope you can understand that anguish."
"I'm upset that it has been doubted whether I'll continue playing Davis Cup. Representing the country is an honour that goes beyond having differences with the AAT, the press, people, whoever. My results are more than decent, at least for me. I will continue to represent the colours and the people, which is the most important thing. I hope that the next captain will consider me for the team."
"I wanted to tell you [the journalists] that I feel bad about the defeat. I apologize if I did not inform you and didn't attend the press conference. Those are tough moments and full of tension. I'm very passionate about the flag and reacted accordingly, but you have to understand the pain of a player who could not win an important point in a final. You have to understand the anxiety and discomfort at that moment. "
"It would be very productive and good to be able to hold these conferences. It is not easy to always do that. I understand the work you [journalists] do. You have to understand my bad moments, when you want to rest, train, or do not want to talk. I am a public person, about everyone wants to know something or read some news. I try to reflect everything that happens on court. Words are like the wind, they get carried away but what remains is my results. I'm not talking to you in order to calm down or be more focused on what I do, which is playing tennis, although it is true that there should be better communication."
"I'm not the one who has to say if someone's guilty, or not."
"I think an analysis is good. If we don't do the 'mea culpa' we cannot build up something for the future. It is true that once a year we have a meeting with Luli [Alberto Mancini] and there, the players say whether they want to play the Davis Cup, or if they don't want to... There are players who don't want to play Davis Cup and they have told Luli. It's a personal choice and agree completely."
"The Davis Cup has a huge influence on your personal calendar. Because it's not just three weeks. Playing against Sweden, at the end I was dead. For two months I could hardly play on the Tour, until after Wimbledon I couldn't really move. Even later, until the Olympics I couldn't play. It takes a lot more than three weeks. Against Sweden I played on all three days, ending with the match on Sunday which went to five sets, I played on one leg and it almost killed me."
After the final,
Clarin did an internet poll, asking if David is still indispensable for the team. Here's the result:

(Photo and quotes:
La Nacion, further quotes from
Clarin.)